Legal Systems

Rawls describes individual rights as, rights representing the moral rights of individuals in society prior to government. individual rights are principles that identify and sanction certain interactions between individuals in a society while excluding others, (20) divers(prenominal) countries have different ways of guarding their citizens humankind rights. Governments that respect individual rights often provide for comprehensive controls that value individual rights.The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the body that deals with the rights of Canadian citizens. The Charter is law and is part of the Canadian governing body. Since the direct is law, the federal government can non easily make changes to it. It is likewise stronger than laws the provinces create. www.hrweb.org/.It guarantees freedoms called fundamental freedoms freedom of conscience and religion, freedom of thought, belief and expression, including freedom of all media and other press. Freedom of peacef ul assembly and freedom of intimacy is excessively guaranteed.These are the basic freedoms that the Canadian citizens share. However, the Charter allows for the limit of these freedoms under certain circumstances like, curtail the freedom of assembly in time of war. To help a disadvantaged group achieve equality, it allows derivative treatment. The Chatter is to be interpreted in way that preserves and enhances the multicultural heritage of Canadians.The United States constitution on human rights is very similar in content to the outlined Canadian individual rights obscure from the some rights in the Canadian Charter can be overridden by governments if they deliberately do so. This is not the case with the United States serviceman rights laws which cannot even be even removed entirely by a constitutional amendment as they are considered unchallengeable under the natural rights principles the Constitution is founded upon.The United States human rights laws, different British l aws are applicable to everyone in the country as a whole and are not subject to small state adherence. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any body process or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein, (Rawls 25). strange the British Human Rights Constitution that is set within the United Kingdom, United States made a popular declaration of its human rights apology strategy.New Zealand, which is a former colony of Britainin its human rights protection aims at developing harmonious relationships between individuals and achievement of equal employment opportunity. New Zealand have authentic a very limited right to privacy on specific topics while primarily equilibrise privacy as one interest against security, commercial and political interests in fragmented legislation and civil wrong law rulings, unlike Britain, which has very complete rules on priva cy rights of individuals. www.hrweb.org/Britain has a very complete and elucidate musical arrangement in handling human rights issues. It has an official union that deals with human rights that is, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which has several protocols guarding human rights The protocols accepted vary from one state to another this is effective in reaching all targets as per their individual need.These protocols include laws prohibiting death penalty, protection against torture, protection against slavery and compel labor with the exception of prison labor and national services. To those protected by the convention of liberty and true(a) arrest.Britain has also established a special approach that deals with human rights violation, European Court of Human Rights, where the philander decision is legally binding and the court awards damages. Inter-state rights violation cases can also be taken to this court for states that are part y ton that protocol. This provides the individual with immunity against abuse and special hearing of cases. The protocol outlines the procedures of a fair trial. Religion, marriage and privacy are also covered in the British human rights laws. The protocols also prohibit discrimination of whatever kind.The amendment of the laws for human rights is also possible with the British system, unlike the American system where the law is protect under natural rights systems. The British laws are much more flexible to neat the needs of the time and change of priority. When protocols are introduced, they need to pass the universal ratification before they perplex into force in order to maintain the institutional unity of the Convention machinery.Despite the British human rights protection strategies being almost similar in content to the other countries, it is more elaborate and its disposal being under its own special court makes it be independent of the general laws and normal courts juri sdiction. The coating of the laws per state also gives the citizens a free choice when it comes to living by the set rules. Its amendments are also much more flexible to expansions and being managed by a special body and not politicians, its more effective in administration and management of issues.Work CitedRawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Revised edition. Cambridge, momma Belknap Press, 1999.Human Rights1st July, 2007.Worldwide Human Rights Network.25th May, 2007 www.hrweb.org/